The Problem With AI "Photography" | It's Worse Than You Think
Howto & Style
Introduction
In recent months, there has been an overwhelming surge in the number of AI-generated photographs populating social media platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. YouTube videos crafted entirely through AI are capturing attention, and some of these images are even clinching awards in photography contests. The prevalence of AI photography seems to be swelling exponentially, leading to concerns about its potential dominance—almost like the ever-consuming blob from old science fiction films.
Last year, it was relatively easy to spot AI-generated images due to their distinctive characteristics. They often exhibited an unnatural, plastic-like glossiness. However, this year marks a significant improvement in their quality. To illustrate this progression, let's consider a famous tree in Bryce Canyon National Park. On one side, you have my own photograph—admittedly not the best—and on the other, a highly refined AI-generated image of the same tree. At first glance, they appear similar, but a closer look reveals striking differences. The AI version depicts the tree sprouting from white rocky ground, while in reality, it grows from dirt. Subtle variations in background details and root structures further differentiate the two. Through my extensive visits to Bryce Canyon, I can confidently say that the AI-generated tree does not exist.
This situation is not isolated. Thousands of AI-generated images emerge daily, racking up user engagement and, more critically, misleading people into believing such entities are real. While some might shrug off this phenomenon as typical social media behavior, as a professional photographer, I find it increasingly concerning. A tangible consequence of this rise in AI imagery is evident in the realm of stock photography. Websites like Shutterstock are now promoting AI-generated content, which, while they still offer traditional stock photos, stand to profit more from AI imagery since they incur no photographer fees.
The financial implications extend to other sectors as well. Consider the case of an Uber Eats driver who lamented AI-generated restaurant menu images. I discovered that AI artists on platforms like Fiverr can create images for as little as $ 15. This presents a dilemma for small businesses: Why hire a professional photographer if they can obtain similar results at a fraction of the cost?
Moreover, a website called TR Treat has emerged, exploiting generative AI to provide brand imagery for e-commerce at unprecedented speeds and low costs. Given my investment in professional photography gear—approximately $ 14,000 in camera bodies, lenses, and software subscriptions—it's increasingly hard to justify this expenditure when AI can replicate high-quality results rapidly and cheaply.
My own expertise lies in landscape photography, where many professionals diversify their income through avenues like print sales or photo tutorials. In this vein, I encountered an individual conversely profiting from AI through online tutorials teaching others how to craft aesthetically pleasing AI photographs. This raises eyebrows regarding the future of photography.
Even if photography is merely a hobby for enthusiasts, the availability of AI tools diminishes the incentive to achieve the perfect shot. For instance, rather than waiting for the perfect sunset cloud formation, one can simply use Photoshop’s AI features to generate an appealing sunset in minutes. Creative manipulation using AI tools blurs the lines between fact and fiction, prompting profound questions regarding the essence of photography.
While there has been some pushback against AI photography, mostly from established photographers, it seems consumers, who are often more focused on the end product, remain indifferent. Traditional genres such as portraits, wedding photography, and journalism are likely to be shielded from the tide of AI, but creative photography may face a daunting challenge as AI continues to advance.
Ultimately, my passion for photography remains steadfast; I've cherished capturing beautiful images since childhood. However, the reality is that AI photography is here to stay. For photographers aiming to stay relevant in this evolving landscape, adaptation will be essential.
Keywords
AI photography, social media, stock photography, Shutterstock, generative AI, product photography, landscape photography, photo manipulation.
FAQ
Q: What is AI photography?
A: AI photography refers to images generated using artificial intelligence tools or algorithms, often mimicking the styles and characteristics of traditional photography.
Q: How can AI-generated images impact professional photographers?
A: AI-generated images may threaten professional photographers' income by offering cheaper alternatives for businesses and consumers who may prefer budget-friendly options.
Q: Are there any genres of photography that are safe from AI encroachment?
A: Yes, traditional genres like portrait, wedding, and journalism photography will likely remain relatively safe, as they rely heavily on unique human experiences that AI cannot replicate.
Q: What are the financial implications for stock photography due to AI?
A: Stock photography services are likely to favor AI-generated images since they do not incur photographer fees and can provide a quicker and cheaper alternative to traditional stock photos.
Q: Can AI tools replace the experience of taking photographs?
A: While AI can replicate high-quality images quickly, it cannot replace the unique experiences, emotions, and artistry involved in traditional photography.
