Unbelievable! The Easiest Way to Bypass AI Content Detection - How I Did It!
People & Blogs
Introduction
Recently, I conducted a thorough examination of the top five services designed to bypass AI detection, and the findings were quite surprising. My first test involved using an abstract that I had written for my PhD thesis back in 2011—definitely human-generated. I tested this abstract using three AI detection tools: Turnitin, Originality, and GP0. It was crucial to establish a baseline where the original text showed no indications of being AI-generated, and the results confirmed that all three tools recognized it as human-written.
Next, I fed the original abstract into ChatGPT and requested a rewritten version tailored for a PhD thesis. Upon analyzing the output, the results varied significantly across the detection tools: Turnitin identified a 40% AI generation likelihood, Originality claimed it was 100% AI, and GP0 recorded a 94% AI likelihood. This led me to question Turnitin’s reliability in detecting AI content, as it appeared to underperform compared to others.
The subsequent analysis focused on various AI bypass tools, starting with FASLEY. I used its service and copied the revised output into a Word document to avoid any straightforward plagiarism detection. The generated text passed Turnitin with a score of 0%, and Originality and GP0 reported it as 39% and 0%, respectively. However, Originality still indicated some AI generation, marking it as the more reliable detection tool in my tests.
I then moved on to Stealth Writer, which had similar processes. It returned a zero detection result on Turnitin, a 39% score on Originality, and zero on GP0. While Stealth Writer offered decent results, Originality still maintained its edge by pinpointing AI-written content.
Next up was Undetectable, a contender that appeared promising based on prior experiences. After using its “humanize” function, the results were also impressive—zero on Turnitin, merely 2% on Originality, and a zero on GP0. Thus, Undetectable emerged as one of the top tools for bypassing AI detection.
Then I tested Bypass AI, which disappointingly did not deliver. While it managed to pass Turnitin, Originality flagged the output as 100% AI—a clear indication that it was ineffective at masking AI generation.
Lastly, I examined Hick Bypass with the highest settings. The output led to zero scores on Turnitin and GP0, but Originality revealed a 56% likelihood of AI detection. Therefore, the standout from the tools tested for ensuring anonymity against AI detection remained Originality.
Throughout this testing process, I realized the valuable lesson that merely passing AI detection does not guarantee quality. The revised texts often contained awkward phrasing and choices that would not hold up to scrutiny from academics and professionals alike.
In summary, for anyone considering submitting AI-generated content, it is essential to treat such outputs as scaffolding rather than final products. Build upon them with your own understanding and paraphrasing before submission.
If you found this analysis valuable, check out my video discussing twelve best AI tools for academics and researchers!
Keyword
- AI detection tools
- Bypass AI content
- Turnitin
- Originality
- GP0
- FASLEY
- Stealth Writer
- Undetectable
- Bypass AI
- Hick Bypass
FAQ
Q1: What tests did you conduct to evaluate AI detection?
A1: I used an original PhD abstract and ran it through Turnitin, Originality, and GP0 to establish a baseline. Then, I rewrote the text using ChatGPT and tested it through various bypass tools.
Q2: Which AI detection tool performed the worst?
A2: Turnitin was found to be the least effective at detecting AI-generated content, often marking human-written abstracts as likely AI-generated.
Q3: What are the best tools for bypassing AI detection?
A3: FASLEY and Undetectable emerged as the top tools for evading AI detection, although they still resulted in some output that was recognizable as AI-generated by Originality.
Q4: Should you submit AI-generated content directly?
A4: Absolutely not. While some texts may pass detection, they often have awkward phrasing and should be thoroughly revised and personalized before submission.
